Bibliographic record
Abstract
(a) Where a parent, guardian or pupil 18 years of age or older knows that a pupil has a severe sensitivity or allergy to certain substances, foods, animals or insect bites or stings or may suffer reactions to drugs, the parent, guardian or pupil 18 years of age or older may request, in writing, that a Principal have on file a written action plan which must be prescribed, in writing, by a physician. (Appendix A- AP 3-13) (b) Under these conditions, the Principal must make note of the Emergency Action Plan in the pupil's Ontario Student Record Folder and make the plans for the emergency procedure known to appropriate teaching and support staff members, including system transportation providers, so that assistance can be given to a pupil. 2. ASTHMA (a) Where a parent, guardian or pupil 18 years of age or older knows that a pupil has asthma, the parent, guardian or pupil 18 years of age or older may request, in writing, that a Principal have on file a written action plan and appropriate oral/topical medication (i.e., inhaler), both of which must be prescribed, in writing, by a physician. (b) Under these conditions, the Principal must make note of the Emergency Action Plan in the pupil's Ontario Student Record Folder and make the plans for the emergency procedure known to appropriate teaching and support staff members so that appropriate assistance can be given to a pupil. 3. EPILEPSY
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.162 | 0.063 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".