MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096059024

regarding the duties of issuers of financial instruments which have been admitted for trading on a regulated market. Anheuser-Busch InBev reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year

2014· article· en· W7096059024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinance, Markets, and Regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEarnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortizationRevenueQuarter (Canadian coin)Total revenueIssuerMargin (machine learning)Operating margin
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Except where otherwise stated, the comments below are based on organic figures and refer to FY13 and 4Q13 versus the same period of last year. For important disclaimers please refer to page 20. Revenue growth: Revenue grew 3.3 % in FY13 and 4.6 % in 4Q13, with revenue per hl growth of 5.8 % in FY13 and 8.4 % in 4Q13 on a constant geographic basis, resulting from favorable brand mix and revenue management best practices Volume performance: Total and own beer volumes declined 2.0 % in FY13, while non-beer volumes decreased 2.2%. In 4Q13, total volumes declined 1.7%, with own beer volumes down 2.0 % and non-beer volumes flat Focus Brands: Our Focus Brands volumes declined by 0.9 % in FY13, driven by challenging macro-economic conditions in a number of our markets. Our global brands grew 4.7 % in FY13, led by growth in Budweiser and Corona of 6.4 % and 3.9%, respectively. In 4Q13, our Focus Brands declined by 2.1%, with growth in our global brands of 2.9% Cost of Sales (CoS): CoS increased 0.9 % in FY13 and decreased by 0.3 % in 4Q13. CoS per hl increased 4.3 % in FY13 and 1.9 % in 4Q13 on a constant geographic basis EBITDA: EBITDA grew 8.1 % in FY13 to 17 188 million USD, with a margin of 39.8%, an increase of 179 bps. In 4Q13, EBITDA grew 13.1 % to 5 199 million USD with margin expansion of 336 bps, and includes a 143 million USD one time gain, recorded in other operating income, related to the recovery of restricted funds in Brazil Net finance costs: Net finance costs (excl. non-recurring net finance costs) in FY13 were 2 486 million USD, and 669 million USD in 4Q13 Income taxes: Income tax in FY13 was 2 016 million USD with a normalized effective tax rate of 16.6%, compared to an income tax expense of 1 680 million USD in FY12 with a normalized effective tax rate of 16.1% Profit: Normalized profit attributable to equity holders of AB InBev grew 10.2 % in nominal

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.739
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0110.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2610.250

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFinance, Markets, and RegulationFrench-language works237,207