The Manual of British Columbia Hydrometric Standards, version 1.0 is an updated and
Bibliographic record
Abstract
British Columbia (SOPHS), version 1.1, 1998. It defines a set of standards with detailed procedures for the acquisition of water quantity data, assessing the data, quality and quantifying data grades. This manual supersedes SOPHS, version 1.1 (1998). The changes to the previous document are based on comments of reviewers and users. It incorporates some of the National Standards (Environment Canada) and adds new information and ideas. Some of the improvements are: • There are new RISC forms for recording the data and calculations. These forms are designed for entry of the data into the ministry’s Water Information Data Management (WIDM) system. • There is a detailed validation process that includes the steps required in reviewing the data and a way of quantifying the quality of the data using data grades. The criteria for the data grades are explained in detail and the information can be obtained directly from the new RISC forms. • New equipment available for hydrometric surveys is identified and discussed. The technologies for collecting, calculating, and storing hydrometric data are continually
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.029 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.012 | 0.021 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.050 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".