MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096149527

Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Arctic Oil And Gas Resources Energy Resources Map Circum-Pacific Region, Arctic Sheet

2015· article· en· W7096149527 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicUltrasound and Cavitation Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArcticSedimentary rockPetroleumBasementMineral resource classificationArctic dipole anomalyTectonicsBathymetric chartSubmarine pipeline
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Arctic Energy-Resources Map published in 2000 covers the North Pacific Ocean, the Arctic Ocean, part of the North Atlantic Ocean and surrounding land. The map shows oil and gas fields, oil sand, oil shale, coal deposits, geothermal energy sites, onshore and offshore thickness of sedimentary rocks, and active tectonic plate boundaries. Background data on land are from the Arctic geologic map (Moore, 2000). Chief tectonic features of the Arctic are (1) parts of the Canadian and Russian shields, (2) broad belts of undeformed, younger sedimentary platform, and (3) fold belts of sedimentary, extrusive and intrusive igneous rocks that extend along the entire margin of the continents facing the Pacific and Arctic Oceans. Sedimentary basins are shown by sediment isopachs, colored to indicate the age of the oldest major sedimentary unit. Age and lithology of the basement is generally indicated by the surrounding bedrock geology. Basic background for oceanic regions is bathymetry printed in a light blue tint. Overprinted on this are sediment isopachs, colored to indicate the age of the underlying oceanic crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Cavitation PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207