© American Dairy Science Association, 2008. Extent of Linkage Disequilibrium in Holstein Cattle in North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The success of fine-scale mapping and genomic selec-tion depends mainly on the strength of linkage disequi-librium (LD) between markers and causal mutations. With Lewontin’s measure of LD (known as D′), high levels of LD that extend over several million base pairs have been reported in livestock. However, this measure of LD can be strongly biased upward by small samples and by low allele frequencies. The aim of this study was to characterize the level and extent of LD in Hol-stein cattle in North America (Canada and the United States for purposes of this study) by using the squared correlation of the alleles at 2 loci (r2). The Affymetrix MegAllele GeneChip BovineMapping 10K single nucle-otide polymorphism (SNP) array was used to genotype 821 bulls, from which 497 were used in the analysis of the extent of LD. A total of 5,564 SNP were used after filtering out SNP with more than 5 % of Mendelian in-consistencies, with more than 20 % missing genotypes, orwith aminor allele frequency of less than 10%.Analy-sis of syntenic pairs revealed that useful LD (measured as r2> 0.3) occurred at distances shorter than 100 kb. Linkage disequilibrium decayed very rapidly, within a few hundred kilobase pairs. In addition, no substantial LD between unlinked loci was found. Using a sliding window analysis, we observed an irregular pattern of LD across the genome. These findings suggest that to capture useful LD, which is required for whole-genome fine mapping and genomic selection, a denser SNPmap would be needed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".