MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096194195

Pages 331–358 Revised stratigraphy, regional correlations and new bentonite radiometric ages for the Albian

2013· article· en· W7096194195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological formations and processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutcropRadiometric datingFlooding (psychology)River valleySection (typography)Stratigraphic section
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Loon River Formation, Fort St. John Group, northwestern Alberta Although the mudstone-dominated Loon River Formation of northwestern Alberta has clear value as a mappable lithostratigraphic unit, its limits have previously not been well defined. The formation definition is here brought into line with the North American Stratigraphic Code with the delineation of upper, lower and lateral boundaries, and the definition of a composite type section with its lower part in the cored well 00/14-18-123-19W5M/0, and an upper part consisting of outcrop sections along the Boyer and Ponton rivers. Wireline-log, core and outcrop correlations indicate that regional transgressive/ flooding surfaces TS1 and TS11, which respectively mark the base of the Spirit River Formation and top of the Peace River Formation in the Peace River area, mark the base and top of the Loon River Formation farther north. Transgressive/ flooding surface TS9, at the top of the Spirit River Formation in the south, can

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.798
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological formations and processes→French-language works237,207→