Running title: Salba improves CVD risk factors in diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Salba improves CVD risk factors in diabetes OBJECTIVE: To determine whether addition of Salba (Salvia hispanica L.), a novel whole-grain, rich in fiber, alpha-linolenic acid (ALA) and minerals, to conventional treatment is associated with improvement in major and emerging cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a single-blind, crossover design, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 37±4 g/day of Salba or wheat bran for 12 weeks while maintained on their conventional diabetes therapies. Twenty well-controlled subjects with type 2 diabetes (11M:9F; age 64±8 years; BMI 28±4 kg/m2; A1C 6.8±0.9%) completed the study. Setting: outpatient clinic (Risk Factor Modification Center, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada). RESULTS: Compared to control, Salba reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP) by 6.3±4 mmHg (p<0.001), hs-CRP (mg/L) by 40±1.6 % (p=0.04), and vonWillebrand factor (vWF) by 21±0.3 % (p=0.03), with significant decreases in A1C and fibrinogen in relation to the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".