European Journal of Plant Pathology 107: 473–483, 2001. © 2001 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Activation of defense responses to Fusarium infection in Asparagus densiflorus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
response, peroxidase, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase Defense responses to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. asparagi and F. proliferatum were compared after root inoculation of the asparagus fern, Asparagus densiflorus vars. Myersii and Sprengeri, and cultivated asparagus, A. officinalis cv. Guelph Millennium. Both varieties of A. densiflorus exhibited a hypersensitive response with rapid death of epidermal cells within 8–24 h and restricted the fungal growth. In A. officinalis roots, rapid cell death was not found, and necrotic lesions were observed 8–14 d after fungal inoculation. Peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonialyase activities increased significantly in inoculated A. densiflorus but not A. officinalis plants. Local and systemic induction of peroxidase activity was detected after pathogen inoculation in root and spear tissues, respectively, of A. densiflorus. POX activity decreased in roots of inoculated A. officinalis by 8 d post-inoculation. Germination and germ tube growth were inhibited when spores of F. oxysporum f. sp. asparagi were incubated in root exudates and on root segment surfaces of inoculated A. densiflorus plants exhibiting hypersensitive cell death. Spore germination of F. proliferatum and three fungi non-pathogenic to cultivated asparagus was inhibited as well. Rapid induction of hypersensitive cell death in A. densiflorus was associated with restriction of fungal growth, and activation of peroxidase and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, two defense enzymes thought to be important for plant disease resistance. Abbreviations: Foa – Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. asparagi; Fp–F. proliferatum; HR – hypersensitive response; PAL – phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; POX – peroxidase; SAR – systemic acquired resistance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.100 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".