Bibliographic record
Abstract
everal changes have taken place in the UAMS Library recently and some others will happen soon. They are as S follows: Interlibrary loans will cost $5 per item effective January 1, 2005. This charge was instituted to cover the increasing costs of interlibrary loans. Copyright fees are assessed whenever we borrow more than five articles from a specific journal title within a calendar year, and the libraries from which we borrow items usually charge a fee for providing the item to us. Copyright fees vary widely, and if the fee is going to be more than $30, the additional cost above $30 will be passed on to the requestor as well (requestors will be notified in advance if additional fees will be incurred). The subscription to Science Citation Index will be cancelled effective January, 2005. There are several alternative ways to obtain the information contained in SCI. See the article elsewhere in this issue for more information. The UAMS Library Computer Use Policy for Visitors (www.library.uams.edu/policy/visitcomp.aspx) has been revised. The Library currently provides four computers which may be used by visitors who wish to search for biomedical information. The revisions to the policy include the prohibition of the use of these four “visitors”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.789 | 0.681 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".