Canada (2013)" DICTIONARY LEARNING FOR SPARSE DECOMPOSITION: A NEW CRITERION AND ALGORITHM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During the last decade, there has been a growing interest toward the problem of sparse decomposition. A very important task in this field is dictionary learning, which is designing a suitable dictionary that can sparsely represent a group of training signals. In most dictionary learning algorithms, the cost function to determine the the optimum dictionary is the ℓ0 norm of the matrix of decomposition coefficients of the training signals. However, we believe that this cost function fails to fully express the goal of dictionary learning, because it only sparsifies the whole set of coefficients for all training signals, rather than the coefficients for each training signal individually. Thus, in this paper we present a new criterion for dictionary learning. We then propose a new dictionary learning algorithm that solves our proposed optimization problem for the case of complete dictionaries. The proposed algorithm follows the idea of smoothed ℓ0 (SL0) algorithm for sparse recovery. Simulation results emphasize the efficiency of the proposed cost function and algorithm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".