The Role of an Organic Slime Matrix in the Formation of
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sandstones from the Black Island member of the Winnipeg Formation (Ordovician) contain a variety of early diagenet-ic iron sul®de morphologies, including elongate concretions of variable length. Examination of sandstone samples with X-radiography reveals that these concretions, now consist-ing of pyrite, are associated with burrows. Detailed textural examination of the pyrite shows an anomalously loose packing of sand grains within these con-cretions, and also suggests that iron sul®de nucleation com-menced at multiple sites in what must have been a stiff ma-trix. Compositional data acquired by electron microprobe indicate that the iron sul®des did not replace fecal matter left behind by the burrower. Sulfur isotope data point to bacterial sulfate reduction as a sul®de source, corroborated by fossilized bacterial remains within the concretionary py-rite. Mucus and slime trails of marine benthos were probably important for early diagenetic pyrite production in these sediments; they can be considered a favorable ``culture' ' me-dium for sulfate reducing bacteria. Because the mucus seems to mineralize very early in burial history, it also pro-vides for enhanced preservation of bacterial remains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".