MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096457388

Assistant General Counsel Interconnection Construction Service Agreement

2011· article· en· W7096457388 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLegal Cases and Commentary
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterconnectionInterimService (business)Psychological interventionElectric power transmissionElectric power
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interconnection Construction Service Agreement (ICSA) entered into among PJM, South Boston Energy, LLC, and Virginia Electric and Power Company. 1 PJM states that the ICSA facilitates the interconnection of the 47.4 MW South Boston Energy Facility located in Halifax County, VA to the PJM transmission system. PJM also explains that the ICSA is being submitted for filing because it supports the South Boston Interim Interconnection Service Agreement and, therefore, this usage does not fully conform to the ICSA as set forth in Attachment P of the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the Director, Division of Electric Power Regulation- East, under 18 C.F.R. § 375.307, your submittal is accepted for filing, effective November 28, 2011, as requested. The filing was noticed on December 28, 2011, with comments, interventions and protests due on or before January 18, 2012. Pursuant to Rule 214 (18 C.F.R. § 385.214 (2011)), to the extent that any timely filed motions to intervene and any motions to intervene out-of-time were filed before the issuance date of this order, such interventions Tariff. 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0150.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLegal Cases and Commentary→French-language works237,207→