FIRE WARDEN AND FIRE DRILL PROCEDURE 1.0 Reason for Procedure DRAFT – UNDER REVIEW
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To set out the Procedures secondary to the Policy entitled “Health and Safety ” in connection with the protection of faculty, staff and students in the event of a fire or other emergency requiring building evacuation by ensuring fire wardens are properly designated and trained for every building or special event on campus and that fire drills are conducted on a regular basis. 2.0 Procedures 2.1. For each building or special event at the University of Manitoba, a sufficient number of fire wardens shall be appointed to ensure the procedures laid out in the Building Fire Safety Plan are duly carried out in the event of a fire alarm or fire emergency. 2.2. Definitions 2.2.1 Building Fire Safety Plan is an information booklet identifying the life safety features of a building, staff responsibilities and procedures to be taken by occupants in the event of a fire alarm or other emergency in a building based on those life safety features. 2.2.2 Chief Fire Warden is a staff member, or in the case of a special event a
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.110 | 0.356 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.108 | 0.091 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".