line resonances in a stretched magnetotail: CANOPUS optical and magnetometer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
[1] Ground-based observations support the existence of 1–4 mHz field line resonances (FLRs) at auroral latitudes. The low frequencies suggest that many nightside FLRs are excited on stretched magnetic field lines in the inner plasma sheet. Data from the Canadian Auroral Network for the OPEN Program Unified Study (CANOPUS) magnetometers and photometers on 21 February 1993 indicate a FLR with a peak at 2.4 mHz, and that of 31 January 1997 indicate a peak at 1.3 mHz. In this paper, models of FLRs and models of stretched magnetotail topologies deduced from optical data are compared with the observations. The FLR model is independently constrained by a parametric near-Earth magnetotail model that allows us to make direct comparisons with the observed FLR frequency. For the two case studies mentioned above, we are able to show that the theoretical FLR spectrum, computed on stretched field lines, is comparable to the low-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".