. (Broadcast); Public Education; *Public Television; Telecommunication.., IDENTIFIERS CAC; Consumer Association of Canada; EDUCDE System 3;
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has made provision for ' three access channels in new cable television systems: one each for the public, educational authorities, and the local;government. The success of these access channels in instituting a two-way relationship between the public and commercial broadcasting is dependent on the presence,of adequate fundi to provide effective programming. In the,interests'of protecting the public interest, the development of a new communications policy is necessary. In aiding the initiation of a socially conscious communications policy, two system proposals are particularly worthy'of consideration. The Consumer Association of Canada,(CAC) conceives the idea of thg Community Information Network with the goal of creating ilhon-profit public information systems that give.primary attention,to the user's needs. EDUCOM"p S.xstem-3 proposal stresses the need for a two-way interactive system which calls for.a collaborative effort between the public and priirat sectors and a synthesis of information gathering and communication. In order to provide access to information for individuals, tAe'bulk of our attention should be focused on the reconsideration of cable television rules to be made by the FCC in
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.178 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".