Bibliographic record
Abstract
Forwarded herewith is Bulletin No. 87 of the International Ice Patrol, describing the Patrol’s services, ice observations and conditions during the 2001 season. While hundreds of icebergs once again made their annual sojourn south, 2001 turned out to be an “inshore year ” with much of the iceberg population remaining close to the coast of Labrador and Newfoundland. The low number (fewer than 90) of icebergs reaching the primary transatlantic shipping lanes despite the large total population once again served to reinforce the challenges of monitoring and predicting iceberg drift and deterioration in the unpredictable weather conditions and dynamic ocean currents that influence the Grand Banks region of the North Atlantic. This year’s report also contains an excerpt (Appendix C) from the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) convention outlining the rules for management, operation and financing of the Ice Patrol. Several significant changes go into effect beginning with the 2002 ice season including a requirement making use of the Ice Patrol’s services mandatory--“Ships transiting the region of icebergs guarded by the Ice Patrol during the ice season are required to make use of the services provided by the Ice Patrol.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.602 | 0.597 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".