800-521-0600 UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL Counter-Current and Flooding in Vertical and Horizontal Tubes with and wit hout Obstructions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This manuscript has been reproduced fmm the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly frorn the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typemiter face. while others may be from any type of cornputer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins. and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a cornplate manuscript and there are missing pages, thes8 will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had ta be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, char&) are reproduced by sectioning the otiginal, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections mth small overlaps. Photographs indudad in the original manuscript have been reproduœd xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6 " x 9 " black and white photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustrations appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI diredly to order. Bell 8 Howell Information and Leaming
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.715 | 0.442 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".