NORTHWEST ATLANIC SPINY DOGFISH Summary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
� A consensus transboundary stock assessment was not developed at this benchmark TRAC. Nevertheless, the TRAC agreed that the model used in the Northeast Regional Stock Assessment Workshop (SAW) 43 spiny dogfish assessment in 2006, with data updated through the 2009 Northeast Fisheries Science Center (NEFSC) spring survey, was appropriate to determine stock status for US management purposes. The status of spiny dogfish and management advice in Canada will be deferred until a TRAC benchmark assessment is developed in the future. � Combined Canada and USA landings in 2007 and 2008 were 5,887 mt and 5,681 mt, respectively. � Female spawning stock biomass (SSB) ( ≥ 80 cm fish) declined from 234,000 mt in 1991 to 52,000 mt in 1999, and remained below 65,000 mt through 2005. Biomass then increased reaching 195,000 mt in 2008 but declined slightly to 163,000 mt in 2009. � Recruitment between 1968-1996 was highly variable. During 1997-2003, pup production was a record low, but subsequently has improved. Recruitment in 2009 was the fifth highest in the 42-year NEFSC spring survey time series.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".