MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096693861

An Integrated Spatial Information System for Ice Service, The 20th

2004· article· en· W7096693861 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSea iceAlphanumericService (business)MandateIcebergGeographic information system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canadian Ice Service (CIS) of Environment Canada is responsible for providing sea ice and iceberg information under the Canadian Federal Ice Program. The mandate of the Canadian Ice Service is to provide timely information on ice conditions for navigational purposes, to warn marine operators of hazardous ice conditions, and to maintain a general historic knowledge of ice conditions and ice climatology. This paper presents the mission-critical application of Remote Sensing and GIS technology in the Canadian Ice Service for supporting the marine community. The products are generated on a daily basis and products turnaround time is 24 hours. A typical day for our operation involves the real-time data acquisition, processing, and analysis of remotely sensed geographic data; the integration of vector, raster, and alphanumeric information; generation and dissemination of text, chart, image and spatially enabled products to clients and partners; clients making their decisions based on the information received from CIS. All products are deposited in a central repository and are made available to the public and partners via a geo-spatial web service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.689

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.012
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0890.077

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207