IV. Membership of Council 5 V. Parliamentary Authority and Procedures 6 VI. Meetings of Council 7
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Council of the Faculty of Social Work (hereafter referred to as “Council”) is the governing structure that brings together teaching staff, field instructors, students, alumni, social workers, the administration, and the University. The Council exercises its power and duties under the University of Toronto Act, 1971, as amended I. Definitions – In this constitution and the accompanying by-laws: “Faculty ” refers to the Faculty of Social Work and “Council ” means the properly composed Council of the Faculty of Social Work of the University of Toronto. “Teaching Staff ” refers to those who hold an academic appointment of 50 % or more. “Administrative Staff ” refers to an appointed staff member of the Faculty of Social Work who holds an appointment of at least 50 % in the Faculty and who is not a member of the teaching staff or a student in the Faculty. “Student ” refers to any student registered with the School of Graduate Studies who is enrolled in a program of study leading to a diploma or degree in the Faculty of Social Work and who is not a member of the teaching or administrative staff of the Faculty. “Alumni ” refers to anyone who is a graduate of the Faculty of Social Work who is not registered as a student or a member of the teaching or administrative staff of the Faculty. “Association of Teaching Centres ” refers to representatives from the Association of
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.018 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.009 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.031 | 0.021 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".