Vasoactive Substances in Isolated Perfused Guinea Pig Lungs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The measurement of pulmonary metabolism of three vasoactive substances and quantitative assessment of changes in lung morphology were performed in a long-term study of asbestos-exposed guinea pigs. Animals received intratracheal injections of a single dose of a sterile suspension of Canadian chrysotile B (5 mg), while control animals received only saline. Six months after the treatment, the guinea pigs were sacrificed, the lungs removed, perfused via the pulmonary artery and the metabolism of vasoactive substances was assessed (in vitro) in a cascade superfusion system. At the end of the experiments, the lungs were fixed in a glutaraldehyde solution for microscopic examination. The tissue response consisted of both inflammatory reaction of terminal and respiratory bronchioles and diffuse alveolar septal infiltration with interstitial fibrosis. The reaction was characterized at six months by a progressive bronchiolitis obliterans with fibroblastic proliferation and collagen formation. The development of the disease did not cause significant changes in the metabolism of acetylcholine and bradykinin. However, the metabolism of prostaglandin E2 decreased with the appearance of the bronchiolitis obliterans. Our results showed that asbestos exposure may produce early biochemical changes resulting in altered lung metabolism of vasoactive substances; these modifications could contribute to the pathogenesis of asbestosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".