MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096753301

Warm up

2016· article· en· W7096753301 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHistory of Computing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParliamentNegotiationSports medicinePrime ministerSpecialtySign (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

strikes at a critical time. And infections are most common immediately before or after high-level competition. Diffl am throat spray was tested as a way to pre-vent upper respiratory symptoms in asso-ciation with a half-marathon race3 (see page 127). Economics in sports and exercise medicine – here to stay! A Canadian systematic review (on which I am an author) has already been tabled in the New Zealand parliament as sensi-ble folks tried to help Prime Minister John Key make a quality decision. The issue was to keep funding exercise classes, which save the nation money by reduc-ing fall-related injuries in seniors4 (see page 80). The days of anyone arguing that that health economics is not sports medicine are patently over. Ask the Australasian College of Sports Physicians as they negotiate with the Rudd gov-ernment to fund their specialty – a spe-cialty that has the potential to limit the economic burden of physical inactivity. Physical inactivity costs the US over $1 trillion annually; clearly exercise is medi-cine – and good value at that. Conference preview – book now for AMSSM in Cancun! Sign up to be a part of AMSSM’s excel-lent conference in Cancun, in Mexico’s Mayan Riviera. Your family will love you for that! At this friendly and value-packed conference you will hear the latest from

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.823
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory of Computing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207