President, Vice-President (Administration) Comptroller Comptroller
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reason for Policy 1.1 To establish cash management practices for the effective safekeeping of, and accounting for, all monies received by the University of Manitoba regardless of the method of payment, and to establish guidelines for the issuance and control of cash receipts. Part II Policy Content 2.1 Cash is defined as all forms of payments received by the University including cash, cheques, money orders, bank drafts, wire transfers, debit card transactions and credit card transactions. 2.2 All departments of the University whose activities include the acceptance and handling of cash on the University’s behalf are responsible for ensuring that: (a) (b) (c) adequate controls and procedures are in place to safeguard cash from time of receipt to time of deposit to a University authorized bank account through Financial Services; all cash and receipts are properly recorded and accounted for; and customer payment information is stored in a secure manner. 2.3 This policy applies to all forms of payment whether received in person, on the phone, by mail, by e-mail, by fax, via the internet, or by other verbal, paper, or electronic medium. Part III Accountability
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.186 | 0.206 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".