MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096771189

LETTERS Novel Respiratory Syncytial Virus A Genotype,

2012· article· en· W7096771189 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypervariable regionGenotypeVirusGene duplicationRespiratory systemGenetic variationDisease
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

virus (RSV) is a major cause of severe respiratory disease in infants and elderly persons. RSV strains have been divided into 2 major antigenic groups (A and B), which are further divided into several genotypes. The main genetic and antigenic differences between genotypes are found within the 2 hypervariable regions of the attachment (G) glycoprotein. In 1999, a novel RSV B genotype, which contained a 60-nt duplication in the second hypervariable region of the G protein, was discovered in Buenos Aires, Argentina, and named BA (1). Since then, genotype BA has almost completely replaced other RSV B strains worldwide and has diversified into several subgenotypes (2). In February 2012, as part of routine RSV surveillance, we identified a novel RSV A genotype with a 72-nt duplication in the second hypervariable region of G, thus representing the first RSV A genotype with nucleotide duplications in the G gene. Shortly thereafter, circulation of this genotype was reported in Ontario, Canada, in 2010–11 and 2011–12, and the genotype was named ON1 (3). To investigate the frequency of genotype ON1 in Germany, we extended the molecular analysis of RSV strains from the previous 2 RSV seasons. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty at the University

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRespiratory viral infections research→French-language works237,207→