Gender differences in developmental links among antisocial behavior, friends' antisocial behavior, and peer rejection in childhood: Results from two cultures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study addressed gender differences in the developmental links among antisocial behavior, friends ’ anti-social behavior, and peer rejection. High and increasing, moderate, and low antisocial developmental trajec-tories were identified among 289 Dutch children, ages 7 to 10, and 445 French-Canadian children, ages 9 to 12. Only boys followed the high trajectory. These boys had more deviant friends and were more often rejected than other children. A minority of girls followed the moderate antisocial behavior trajectory. These girls had fewer deviant friends than moderate antisocial boys, but moderate antisocial boys and girls were equally likely to be rejected. The influence of friends and poor peer relations plays a crucial but different role in the development of antisocial behavior among boys and girls. Developmental trajectories of antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence have received increased attention in the developmental literature in recent years (e.g., Bongers, Koot, van der Ende, & Verhulst, 2004; Broidy et al., 2003; Nagin & Tremblay, 1999; van Lier & Crijnen, 2005; for clarity, the term antisocial behavior will be used unless more specific forms of antisocial behavior, such as physical aggression, are meant). These studies all identified a small minority of boys who are chronically antisocial from child-hood into adolescence. These studies also found that girls exhibit lower levels of antisocial behavior. Still, a small group of girls appear to follow a deviant trajectory characterized by consistently elevated levels of antisocial behavior. It has also been shown that the levels of antisocial behavior among these small groups of at-risk boys and girls increasingly diverge from those of their more normative peers, who exhibit low and desisting levels of antisocial behavior. These findings are from studies conducted
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".