Purposes: peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) 1. Name and address of the owner and manager of the captive breeding operation:
Bibliographic record
Abstract
of parental breeding stock: All peregrine parental stock was bred in captivity in the United States between 1996 and 2007, with the exception of one male and one female peregrine imported into the United States from Canada in 2003 and 2004. The list of parental breeding stock is attached (Attachment 1). The operation maintains 14 founders (7.7). All parental stock was imported, purchased, transferred, or bred by the applicant. Each parent has a closed U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) leg band, or a Canadian leg band for the imported birds. 5. Range State evidence that parental stock was obtained in accordance with the relevant national laws: The range of the peregrine falcon extends into the United States. Falco peregrinus anatum ranges from Canada to northern Mexico. Falco peregrinus pealei is found along the coastal Pacific Northwest from Washington to western Alaska (White et al. 2002). The applicant has been licensed by the USFWS as a breeder of peregrine falcons, gyrfalcons, and hybrids since 1997 (license number: MB834663-0), as well as being licensed as a master falconer (license number: MB695833-0). With the exception of a male and a female peregrine imported from Canada (specimen numbers CW011535 and CX011252), the peregrine parental stock was acquired from other USFWS-licensed raptor breeders/falconers in the United States. All parental specimens are captive bred in the U.S. or Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.186 | 0.101 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".