MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7096840911

© 2010 Canadian Medical Association or its licensors

2010· article· en· W7096840911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Case Reports and Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoglossal nerveCranial nervesPtosisPupilCracklesTongueVertebral arteryOphthalmoscopy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A61-year-old right-handed man presented with a two-day history of a new headache that had developedgradually several hours after he dived into a lake. The headache, which encompassed the entire left side of the head, had a maximal intensity of 10 out of 10 and was described as dull and constant with mild photophobia. The patient also reported blurry vision in the left eye. In addition, his speech was slurred, and he had difficulty swallowing. There were no carotid or vertebral artery bruits evident on physical examination. Cranial nerve examination demon-strated 2.5-mm ptosis of the left eye; in addition, the diameter of the left pupil was 1 mm smaller than that of the right in dim light (Figure 1). Both pupils were reactive, and there was no relative afferent pupillary defect. The tongue deviated to the left when protruded; there were no fasciculations (Figure 1). The results of the remainder of the cranial nerve examination were normal, including normal gag response, symmetric ele-vation of the palate and full power in the sternocleidomastoid and trapezius muscles. The results of motor, sensory, cerebel-lar and gait testing were unremarkable. Ophthalmoscopy and visual-field testing during a neuro-ophthalmologic consulta-tion did not reveal any additional abnormalities. At this point, the main diagnostic considerations included a cervical mass lesion within the carotid sheath, such as dissec-tion of the carotid artery, which could cause a mass effect on the adjacent ascending sympathetic plexus or on cranial nerve XII at the base of the skull, beyond the point of emergence from the hypoglossal foramen. Such a mass would cause ipsi-lateral Horner syndrome (see Box 1) and deviation of the tongue. Alternatively, a left-sided lesion of the brainstem Cases Dissection of the internal carotid artery causing Horner syndrome and palsy of cranial nerve XII

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4140.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMedical Case Reports and StudiesFrench-language works237,207