MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096859790

AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT, LANDS AND PARKS SMITHERS AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN:

2015· article· en· W7096859790 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticulatesChristian ministryAir quality indexAir monitoringAir pollutionEnvironmental monitoring
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Environmental Protection Programme of BC Environment (Skeena Region) has responded to public concern regarding the environmental impacts of airborne particulate matter in the Bulkley Valley. Over the past several years, the Ministry has implemented an air quality monitoring programme. This programme has yielded data on inhalable and total suspended particulate concentrations as well as other parameters such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and dustfall. Assessment of inhalable particulate data indicated that ambient air quality in Smithers is degraded for approximately one month per year during a cold winter (i.e., winter 1990-1991). Periods of impaired air quality occurred only during winter months, a period coincidental with residential home heating with wood and poor dispersion meteorology. Annual averages indicate inhalable particulate concentrations exceed desirable levels. The Ministry, with the support of the BC Lung Association and Environment Canada, has intensified the ambient monitoring programme with the deployment of a new continuous, real-time, inhalable particulate monitor. This monitor, the TEOM (Tapered Element

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→