Aboriginal Rights and Title in Canada after DelgClm"uklV: Part "1\\\\'0, Anthropological Perspectives on Rights, Tests, Infringement & Justification
Bibliographic record
Abstract
has been (111 impOrlw!l mOlUclI / ill detcrmining the /la/lire and eXlem of Aboriginal righls alld litle ill Canada, This p(lfJer (the secolld of a t.... o-parl essay) critically 1,€I,iew $ Ihis decision, drawillg on an/hro-poiogiclli fwd legal scholarship (0 put illlo cofltext how Aboriginal righls and litle /llIl'e been cOllceptuali:ed and arglled. lfirst examine Ihe lise of lire notion of 'Cllilltre ' in formul(l/ing cOllcepliollS of abo-rigilwl righls alld litle, This is followed by a crilical disCllssioll of how anlhropology has and can cOlllilllle fa playa pari in prol'iding evidence for alld cri/iquillg legal (esls for proof illfringemem OIld jus/ijic(liiol! of alwrigillfll righls fllld tille. Lejugemenl de 10 Caul ' supreme dll COl/ada concernant De[gamuukw CII /997 a ele U/I th'f!//cmel1l impol"/olll dOllS la delermifwtion de 10 /lUlUI'( ' et de I'elendue des droils el du litre lllIlveh(OlleS au Canada. Cel expo.~e (Ie dellxieme d '1IIIe disserlalion en deux parties), examine ce jllgemel/I de maniere crilique, faisanl oppel au savoi,.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".