Bibliographic record
Abstract
Analysis of hitherto unreleased 1971 census data reveals extreme occupational differentials between native and non-native Canadians. The findings include results at the provincial level and for both sexes, and distinguish the Inuit from Indians, nonstatus from status Indians, and on/off reserve residence. L'analyse de certaines donnees fournies par le recensement national de 1971, données qui n'ont pas été rendues publiques jusqu'ici, révèle d'extrêmes écarts, sur le plan du travail, entre la situation des Canadiens d'origine indigene et les autres. Les résultats fournis par cette analyse comprennent ceux trouvés au niveau provincial et concernant les deux sexes, et font la distinction entre les Inuit et les Indiens, entre les personnes d'origine indigène ayant le statut d'Indien, et celles qui ne Font pas, et entre les individus résidant ou non sur les réserves. THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF NATIVE STUDIES II, 2 (1982): 305-520304 E. HUGH LAUTARD Regardless of whether ethnic relations in Canada are conceived as producing a cultural mosaic or a "melting pot, " native Indians and Inuit are unequivocally
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.578 | 0.286 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".