Masters of their conditions: At the crossroads of health, culture and the performing arts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Achieving one’s cultural or clinical identity is a matter of performance. The performing body is made through a series of apprentice-ships that lead to mastery and then transmission. Performance, like culture and medicine, has its systems of learning, i.e. in the professions of the performing arts. This article examines the methodology of theater anthropology and other aspects of performance studies. Applications to intercultural work are described that make it possible for patient and healer to collaborate to master the condition. Key words embodiment • intercultural therapy • migration • performance studies • rehabilitation • ritual • theater anthropology Individuals with a medical or psychiatric condition are usually referred to as patients. Patients are more or less prisoners of their condition, be it illness, disability or any other trauma that may be clinically expressed. Learning to cope with an illness, its physical and psychological components, its social implications and its cultural specificities, compares with practices that can be learned through an apprenticeship. The performing arts involve forms of apprenticeship that can shape the body of a performer in ways that facilitate understanding the practice in terms of body, mind, soul and environment (spatial, temporal and sensory dimensions). Those who are able to learn these modes of performance progressively master the condition they are living. At some point, they are Vol 40(3): 299–328[1363–4615(200309)40:3;299–328;033594] Copyright © 2003 McGill University transcultural psychiatry
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".