MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096983579

Accretion Disks and Stellar Jets Around T Tauri Stars

2007· article· en· W7096983579 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsT Tauri starAccretion (finance)Adaptive opticsAccretion discHubble space telescopeStarsInfraredTelescope
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

. Results from Adaptive Optics imaging of accretion disks and stellar jets around pre-main sequence T Tauri stars are presented. The data were obtained with PUEO, the Adaptive Optics Bonnette attached to the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT). The results on mass loss include a study of the morphology of the jet in the multiple star RW Aur. Also, a study of the morphology and proper motions of emission knots in the micro-jet of DG Tau is presented. On the other hand, the results on mass accretion include images and models in the optical and near infrared of the scattered light by the accretion disk surrounding HK Tau B. The optical images are from WFPC2, on board HST. Many geometrical parameters of the disk are deduced (e.g., inclination, radius). So are the vertical scale height and the surface density distribution of the grains responsible for the scattered light. The disk mass is also estimated. This exemple shows how the Hubble Space Telescope and ground-based adaptive optics im...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies→French-language works237,207→