MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096992313

for Women’s Health Women’s Health Bureau Health Canada Postal Locator 1903C

2001· article· en· W7096992313 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSex and Gender in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipExcellenceWork (physics)Health careHealth promotionPublic healthHealth policyHRHIS
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

www.cwhn.ca Launched in 1996, the Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health (CEWH) are funded by Health Canada and administered by the Women’s Health Bureau. The work of the program is a major component of Health Canada’s Women’s Health Strategy. Five centres, each a dynamic partnership of academics, researchers, health care providers and community-based women’s and women’s health organizations, are located in Halifax, Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg and Vancouver. The Canadian Women’s Health Network (CWHN) is also funded under CEWH to support national networking and communications components of the program. CEWH RESEARCH SYNTHESIS GROUP The Centres of Excellence for Women’s Health established the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5610.170

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSex and Gender in Healthcare→French-language works237,207→