MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7096994874

Background

2016· article· en· W7096994874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHib vaccineIncidence (geometry)Conjugate vaccineVaccinationDiseaseMeningitisPublic health
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First available in Alaska in 1991, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccine has resulted in one of the greatest public health successes of the last 25 years. Prior to vaccine availability, Hib was the most common cause of meningitis in children, and Alaska Native children aged <5 years experienced rates of Hib disease that were 6-fold higher than similarly aged children in the United States (400–700 vs. 60–100 cases per 100,000 persons, respectively).1 The highest reported rate of Hib disease occurred in children from the Yukon-Kuskokwim (YK) Delta and Kotzebue, where 2–4 % of infants experienced Hib disease in the first year of life.1 Since routine vaccination was instituted, Hib disease rates in Alaska children have decreased by more than 95%. However, an analysis of Hib incidence from 2000–2006 revealed that Alaska Natives continue to experience substantially higher rates of Hib diseases compared to non-Native Alaskans (6.0 and 0.4 cases per 100,000 persons, respectively; Figure).2 Since 2002, 11 of 14 (79%) Hib cases in children aged <10 years occurred in the YK

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3150.107

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBacterial Infections and Vaccines→French-language works237,207→