Bibliographic S e ~ c e s wnrices bibliographiques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant a la National Ij'brary of Canada to Bibliotheque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distniute or sell reproduire, p r k, disttibuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette these sous paper or electronic formats. Ia forme de rnicrofiche/film, de reproduction sur papier on sur format electronique. The author retains ownership of the L'auteur conserve la propriete du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d'auteur cpi prot&ge cette these. thesis nor substantial extracts from it Ni la these ni des-ts substantiels may be printed or otherwise de celle-ci ne doivent 6tre imprim& reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son permission, autorisation. COPYRIGHT
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.057 | 0.109 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.676 | 0.583 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".