Bibliographic record
Abstract
John Sievenpiper and colleagues re-cently reported significantly higher blood glucose levels at 30, 45 and 60 minutes after a 900-mL meal than after a 600-mL or 300-mL meal of 75 g of glu-cose.1 Any increase in volume or decrease in osmolarity leading to an increase in the rate of gastric emptying during the first hour of the test with no effect on the result at 2 hours is intriguing. There is also evidence that blood glucose levels might be affected by the ambient temperature. In Brazil, a 75-g load of glucose given to 1030 pregnant women resulted in a glucose concentra-tion that was 0.2 mmol/L higher at 25–31°C than at 20–24°C. The corre-sponding value at 5–14°C was 1.03 mmol/L lower than at 25–30°C.2 This variable might affect test results in Canada given that ambient room tem-perature fluctuates. For the findings of Sievenpiper and collegues to be benefi-cial globally, comprehensive investiga-tions should be carried out at high and low ambient temperatures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.240 | 0.135 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".