Dino£agellate cyst assemblages from E⁄ngham Inlet,
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A palynological study of surface samples from Effingham Inlet, southwestern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, was carried out to assess environmental and oceanographic controls on the distribution of dinoflagellate cyst species. Generally dinoflagellate cyst assemblages from all samples are dominated by Operculodinium centrocarpum sensu Wall and Dale, 1966, Spiniferites spp. and round brown (protoperidinioid) cysts. The differences among the assemblages are mainly in relative and absolute abundance of various taxa, presence and absence of various protoperidinioid taxa, species diversity (Shannon Diversity Index), dinoflagellate cyst concentration in the samples, and ratio of terrestrial to marine palynomorphs. Dinoflagellate cyst assemblages in the two sub-basins of this inlet are quite distinct, with the inner basin characterized by lower diversity and the outer basin being characterized by higher diversity due to the occurrence of several protoperidiniacean species. Primary productivity in this inlet is enhanced by periodic incursion of nutrient-rich surface water from the Pacific Ocean which is related to coastal upwelling. Primary productivity is higher in the outer basin than the inner basin. 7 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".