MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097051772

POWERS: A STUDY IN HEALTH, WORK, AND GENDER

2014· article· en· W7097051772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational and environmental lung diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsbestosSubsidiaryMultinational corporationAsbestos fibersState (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asbestos is a naturally-occurring mineral fiber with a silky texture whose distinctive properties-high mechanical strength, even at high temperatures; incombustibility; good insulating qualities; durability; flexibility; indestructibility; and low cost- have caused its widespread use in industry.4 Brazil is among the world's five greatest producers of asbestos and is also an important consumer of the mineral. There is, therefore, a great deal of attention being paid by the world scientific community to Brazilian practices now that most European countries have prohibited the use of asbestos. The largest asbestos mine in Brazil at the present time is located in the Municipality of Minaçu in the State of Goiás. The mine is managed by subsidiaries of the French multinational Saint-Gobain, whose home country has prohibited asbestos since the beginning of 1997. Asbestos is used in thousands of products in Brazil, especially in the construction industry (roof tiles and water tanks) and in other sectors and products such as brakes (linings and pads), joints, gaskets, clutch plates, cloth, and in special coatings and coverings such as paints and floor tiles, among other uses (Giannasi, 1995). Canada (after Russia) is the world's second largest producer of asbestos and is a large exporter of the raw material, but compared to Brazil it uses relatively little asbestos. Annual asbestos

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOccupational and environmental lung diseases→French-language works237,207→