Bibliographic record
Abstract
the last decade. All are believed to be the result of lightning strikes to the antenna. The insulators that failed are fiberglass-belted safety core insulators that had been installed in the late 1990s. An investigation into these failures was undertaken in order to understand the cause of the failure and the implications to other sites having the same type of insulator. At the same time, the Navy has initiated a procurement program to replace the safety core insulators at Cutler with fail-safe insulators. The first array insulators will be replaced in the summer of 2007 and the second in the summer of 2009. The cost of this replacement is significant. The safety core insulators were tested at VLF voltage prior to their installation at Cutler, but they were not tested with impulses. All flashovers in the VLF tests occurred in the air between the corona rings. As a part of the investigation, impulse tests were done at Hydro Quebec; the tests showed that flashover occurred along the surface of the insulator when the voltage rises very fast (high dV/dt). Flashover along the surface is believed to be the primary cause of damage to the safety core insulators. Our conjecture is that making the design such that the flashover takes place in the air will protect the insulator. We used a scale model insulator to investigate the flashover phenomenon using an impulse
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".