SOUTHERN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS JULY, 1976 A TWO-PRICING SYSTEM FOR EXPORTING FROZEN CONCENTRATED
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Florida citrus industry is in the unique essence, imports provide one way of achieving a position of being both importer and exporter of two-pricing system for Florida's exports. frozen concentrated orange juice. On one hand, A second basic question relates to whether or not exports provide the industry with an additional outlet this type of international transaction is desirable for for concentrate. On the other, imports being brought the citrus industry. into the U.S. market creates considerable controversy Two aspects of international markets allow the as to whether this imported juice is economically above programs to become operational. First, desirable for the industry. Florida's domestic price has consistently been at a Two basic issues have evolved from these inter- premium relative to the world price. Second, U.S. national trading activities. First, Florida exports tariff controls allow 99 percent of all duties on concentrate on both Canadian and European markets. concentrate imports to be regained, once an equiva-The former differs little from the domestic market lent quantity of concentrate is exported. The latter [1, 3]. In contrast, the European market is expected policy is known as the "duty drawback " provision. to differ substantially from the U.S. market. Florida Thus, imports can be brought into the domestic faces a number of competing suppliers in Europe. market if an equivalent quantity is exported within
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.130 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".