MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097088000

Additional details and supporting information can be found in the Appendix of the GARM-III

2012· article· en· W7097088000 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscardsStock (firearms)Stock assessmentShrimpContinental shelf
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

American plaice is distributed along the Northwest Atlantic continental shelf from southern Labrador to Rhode Island in relatively deep waters (Collette and Klein-MacPhee 2002). Off the U.S. coast, American plaice are managed as a single stock in the Gulf of Maine-Georges Bank region (Figure H1) where the greatest commercial concentrations exist between 90 and 182 m (50 and 100 fathoms). This stock was last assessed and peer reviewed in August 2005 at the GARM-II meeting (O’Brien et al. 2005). The assessment was conducted using VPA with total catch including commercial landings, large mesh discards, and shrimp trawl discards for ages 1-9+. For terminal year 2004, total commercial landings were 1,711 mt and fully recruited F (ages 5-8, unweighted average) was estimated to be 0.15, the lowest F in the time series (1980-2004). Spawning stock biomass was 14,149 mt in 2004, a 10 % decrease from 2003. The 2003 (54.8 million age 1 fish) and 2004 (66.7 million age 1 fish) year classes were well above the long term average (33.1 million age 1 fish). The spring and autumn research survey indices of abundance indicated a decreasing trend during 2000-2005. Recruitment indices of age 1 fish from NEFSC autumn

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7850.493

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→