Manuscrit auteur, publié dans "QPES 2013: 7th french international colloquium Questions de Pédagogies dans l'Enseignement Supérieur: les innovations pédagogiques en enseignement supérieur, Sherbrooke: Canada (2013)"
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce texte présente plusieurs aspects originaux d’un dispositif d’apprentissage par projet comme les techniques de gestion de projet, la négociation avec un client et le travail en groupe multiculturel. Il explique le succès qu’il rencontre auprès des élèves, des industriels et des enseignants qui les encadrent. Depuis quelques années, différents facteurs liés à une internationalisation grandissante des élèves obligent à proposer régulièrement des adaptations du processus d’apprentissage. Mots-clés Parcours professionnalisant, mondialisation, identités, compétences, pédagogie par projets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".