Fostering Collaboration in Winnipeg
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many communities across North America are now looking to improve quality of life of their citizens through an enhanced street environment with integrated transportation choices. The City of Vancouver has begun to address streets in a more wholistic manner through collobora-tion and design. In 2002, the City of Vancouver embarked on the development of a Downtown Transportation Plan (DTP). The plan made 80 recommendations including 83 specifi c initiatives to increase the transportation options in down-town Vancouver. The Carrall Street Greenway is one of the specifi c initiatives currently underway. In Winnipeg, there is clear recognition that both collaboration and design are crucial to integrating transportation choice in the urban fabric. Consid-eration is currently being given by staff to defi ne internal processes and if necessary, amend or establish planning and design tools to facilitate a more collaborative approach to the planning, design and construction of public right of ways.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.025 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".