MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7097146571

Offsite Timber Storage and Decked Timber at Harvest Site

2006· article· en· W7097146571 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Management and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct (mathematics)HaulageLiabilityCartonMillLoggingLegislature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To provide Public Lands & Forests and timber operators with procedures to address the offsite storage of harvested timber and decked timber left at harvest areas. To accurately track the storage of Crown and purchase timber harvested by or for timber operators, which has not been reported to the Crown. To identify to the Departmental Forest Protection staff, values at risk. Limit the liability associated with loss of crown revenue, ensure legislative compliance and provide industry client operational flexibility. Policy In situations where felled timber is left at the harvest area, the client shall provide details to the department regarding the timber. The department may establish the minimum information required to be provided with respect to the felled timber left at the harvest site. The disposition holder or mill owner shall make application to the department for all other forms of offsite storage of timber. Use of offsite timber storage sites for a mill or disposition holder’s timber requires written approval from the Area Manager detailing conditions regulating the use and reclamation of the storage site. In all situations where the offsite storage site has not been approved as a weigh scale site, the timber shall not lose its identity as to the origin of harvest with the exception of private and salvage timber, which may be combined as one entity. In the event there is loss or damage of stockpiled timber, the disposition holder shall be billed for such volume loss at the dues rate in effect at the time of loss for the product the department deems the timber was intended. This shall include any assessment of merchantable volume loss at sites where the timber is merchandized. Any offsite storage, which may involve provincial road or rail access, must first obtain approval from Alberta Infrastructure and Transportation for such a site. Timber harvested and left for a period exceeding one year from the time of harvest may be forfeited and become the property of the Crown.- 2-Procedure

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.512
Threshold uncertainty score0.696

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5120.308

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForest Management and Policy→French-language works237,207→