I. CURRENT SITUATION OF PSYCHOTHERAPEUTIC PROFESSIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Identity of the psychotherapeutic professions Psychotherapy remains a largely unregulated practice in Canada, but this is changing. As in many other countries, several regulated professions (medicine, psychology, social work) practice psychotherapy, but governments have not until recently attempted to regulate psychotherapy as a profession. Whereas psychiatry and psychology are regulated by statute in every Canadian province, only Québec regulates counselling (i.e., guidance counselling), with SPR Panel on Psychotherapy: Canada 2 2 other provinces moving towards statutory regulation. As for psychotherapy, Québec has developed, in 2009, statutory regulation that protects the title of “psychotherapist ” and defines its practice. Ontario is in the process of developing similar regulations. • The situation in Québec In 2000, the Office des professions du Québec, which is the governmental body that oversees all 45 regulatory bodies in Quebec, reviewed the scope of practice of all professionals involved in the field of physical health. This led to a major reform as reflected in Bill 90 that was
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".