MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097173650

(LOP) , H .2 E

2002· article· en· W7097173650 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusicians’ Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCuffDeformation (meteorology)Layer (electronics)Thin layerTechnician
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

s • a third brand of disposable cuffs used withthe stockinette sleeve supplied with each cuff. • the first brand of cuffs used with tubular elas-tic material sleeves matched specifically tothese cuffs.Our hypothesis is that some types of cuff/padding combinations will cause substantiallyless severe wrinkling and pinching of the skinthan others.Method The University of British Columbia granted ethi-cal approval for this study. To approximate the deformation of the skin surface in contact with the cuff or padding,we placed a layer of modelling clay sheet (Model Magic,Binney & Smith Canada, Lindsay Ontario Canada, extruded through rollers to a uniform 2.5 mm thickness and covered with a single layer of plastic film) on the limb of the subject.An experienced technician applied the limb protection or padding (if used) and cuff ensuring that the overlap of the cuff was posi-tioned over the modelling clay sheet. The cuff was inflated to 200 mmHg for one minute, deflated, and removed. The modelling clay sheet (now

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMusicians’ Health and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207