Bibliographic record
Abstract
s • a third brand of disposable cuffs used withthe stockinette sleeve supplied with each cuff. • the first brand of cuffs used with tubular elas-tic material sleeves matched specifically tothese cuffs.Our hypothesis is that some types of cuff/padding combinations will cause substantiallyless severe wrinkling and pinching of the skinthan others.Method The University of British Columbia granted ethi-cal approval for this study. To approximate the deformation of the skin surface in contact with the cuff or padding,we placed a layer of modelling clay sheet (Model Magic,Binney & Smith Canada, Lindsay Ontario Canada, extruded through rollers to a uniform 2.5 mm thickness and covered with a single layer of plastic film) on the limb of the subject.An experienced technician applied the limb protection or padding (if used) and cuff ensuring that the overlap of the cuff was posi-tioned over the modelling clay sheet. The cuff was inflated to 200 mmHg for one minute, deflated, and removed. The modelling clay sheet (now
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.701 | 0.462 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".