Bibliographic record
Abstract
i herie and quatic cience Indu try rep rt contain the re ult f re earch and de\\elopment u eful to indu try for either immediate or futur appli ation. The. ' are directed primarily to\\\\ard indi \\ idual in the primary and econdar) ector f the fi hmg and marine indu tri.. '0 re triction i placed n ubJect matt r and the rie renect the road intere t and policie of the Department of Fi herie and 0 ean,namel), fi herie and aquatic clence Indu tf) report rna) be cited a full publi ation. The correct citation app ar above the ab tract of ea h report. h rep rt I ab tracted in Aqualll ciel1le and Fi herie Ah. [rael and indexed in the Department ' annual inde. ' t cientifi and techni al publication. 'umb r I 91 in thl erie v.ere i ued a Project Rep rt fthe Indu trial De\\el-
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.278 | 0.086 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".