ENVIRONMENT DIRECTORATE TRADE DIRECTORATE Joint Working Party on Trade and Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Document complet disponible sur OLIS dans son format d'origine Complete document available on OLIS in its original formatCOM/ENV/TD(98)127/FINAL PREFACE This document was prepared for and presented to the Joint Session of Trade and Environment Experts, as part of the OECD work programme on trade and environment. Prepared by Jan Adams, the report is a synthesis of the studies on three individual multilateral environmental agreements-- CITES, the Montreal Protocol and the Basel Convention-- which themselves were prepared by Dale Andrew of the Trade Directorate (CITES) and Jan Adams of the Environment Directorate (Montreal Protocol and Basel Convention). The text is released as an unclassified document under the responsibilty of the Secretary General of the OECD with the aim of bringing information on this subject to the attention of a wider audience. The document, as well as the three individual studies on CITES, the Montreal Protocol and the Basel Convention, can also be found on the world wide web at
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.132 | 0.070 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".