MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097264053

Submitted by:

2006· article· en· W7097264053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Resources Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNorth westQueen (butterfly)West coastPort (circuit theory)Period (music)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

- ii-Executive Summary The Variable Retention Windthrow Monitoring project has been ongoing for five years, the first two years as a pilot study. The first year of the project included the eastern portion of Weyerhaeuser’s West Island Timberlands in south central Vancouver Island and the Queen Charlotte Island Timberlands. The second year focused on the Klanawa and Walbran watersheds in West Island Timberlands, Port McNeill Timberlands and North Island Timberlands. In the third year, the study expanded to include the Sprout Lake portion of West Island Timberlands, South Island Timberlands and Stillwater Timberlands. New plots were also established in North Island Timberlands and the Queen Charlotte Islands. The fourth year of the study saw the establishment of new plots in variable retention harvest units at North Island Timberlands, Port McNeill Timberlands and Stillwater Timberlands. Re-sampling took place on the majority of the pilot study sites that had experienced less than two winter wind seasons at the time of the initial sampling. During the fifth year of the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.7480.648

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Quality and Resources StudiesFrench-language works237,207