MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7097314672

An Open Letter to the Kimble County Commissioners Court and the Citizens of Kimble

2010· article· en· W7097314672 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw, Rights, and Freedoms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiberian dollarTaxpayerState (computer science)Asset (computer security)ResidenceDowntown
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The budget process is about pinching pennies. Doing more for voters with less. The budg-et approval period is nearing its end, and your 198th DA’s Office is again looking to max-imize services to the citizens we serve while keeping costs to the taxpayer as low as pos-sible. During the last budg-et cycle, I was asked by the Commissioners to make cuts in the District Attorney’s Office, and I did. We lost a full-time prosecutor, a part-time pros-ecutor, and an investigator. This past year we sought additional ways to be good stewards of public funds--finding ways to do more with less, and I’m proud to say we have. For every dollar Kimble County gave the 198th DA’s Office, we gave back over six dollars to Kimble County including the contribution of more than $300,000 in fines and asset forfeitures to the County. I feel confident that there are few other agencies in the entire State that can say the same. Going further. I have found a way to fund portions of the DA’s office without tapping Jon Budd, 25, of Bristol, England, started on his bicycle in Vancouver, Canada, August 12, and traveled down Hwy. 101 where he ended his North/ South trip on September 9, in Tijuana, Mexico. He is now traveling from West to East after beginning in San Diego. Budd spent the night at Junction North Llano River KOA and then continued

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.849
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaw, Rights, and FreedomsFrench-language works237,207